Panzer General is a top-down, turn-based, historical battle game developed and published by Strategic Simulations, Inc and released for DOS in 1994. It was one of the first games (if not the first) that gave you the ability to play for the Nazis, but succeed where Hitler failed. Forza Motorsport 7 has been released officially on October 3rd and after just a few days of work is available for Mac OS computers. Download now Forza Motorsport 7 Mac OS X and take the steering wheel in your own hands. Try also: DiRT 5 Mac OS X. MORE THAN 700 CARS ARE WAITING for YOU! IMac — beautiful, intuitive all-in-one desktops with incredible processors, a Retina display, and the world's most advanced desktop operating system.
Panzer Corps
Panzer Corps is a WWII-themed, Turn-based Strategy, Single-player and Multiplayer War video game takes place in the historical world developed by Flashback Games and published by Slitherine Ltd. The setting of the game is set in World War 2 and puts the player in the tent of general in charge of Axis armies, around twenty-six challenging scenarios in a vast campaign tree, commanding core forces through the conflict. During the gameplay, the core forces obtain experience points and use to upgrade new weaponry as they become visible. There are more than eight-hundred unit types, split into twenty unit classes, and the player can explore the extensive environment. In the game, the player must use the strength of his units and the weaknesses of his foes to dominate the battlefield. The player as the general must command his army, navigate the land, the battle against enemy troops, and conquer their bases to win the fight. Panzer Corps includes prominent features such as 800 Units, 20 Classes, 24 Terrain Types, 26 Scenarios, over 30 Nations, and more.
#1 Unity of Command
Unity of Command is a Single-player, War-based, and Turn-based Strategy video game developed by 2×2 Games and published by Dvaput. The game centers on two playable factions such as Soviet Side and Axis. It takes place in the historical world where you can command the Wehrmacht forces or Red Army during Eastern campaign of 1942 to 1943. Lead your force through battle and compete against another team in turn-based combat. The game rewards you with points as you defeat against team and can use these rewards to upgrade your performance, power, and units. Conquer the playfield and loot the resources of against team. Upgrade your army and purchase weapons for them. As the game proceed, it becomes challenging and you can face challenging tasks. It has a series of levels and you have to complete each one to prove yourself in as the best commander. With brilliant mechanics, addictive gameplay, and detailed graphics, Unity of Command is the best game to play and enjoy.
#2 Twilight Struggle
Twilight Struggle is a Board, Strategy, Turn-based, Cold War, Single and Multiplayer video game developed and published by Playdek, Inc. The game takes place the world map and lets you select your nation, place your armies, attack on other players and dominate the world. It drops you at the center of cold war and revolving around the economic and political struggle between U.S.S.R and U.S. In the game, you can control one of two superpowers and your main task is to fight against other players, conquer their nations, and complete the game. Complete objectives to earn points and use them to unlock other weapons, tools, and stuff. Create your guild with other players and dominate the world. Raise your army, equip them with deadly weapons and show your power. Twilight Struggle includes key features such as game Tutorial, Real-time Online Play, Customization, Rating System and more. Try it out and you'll enjoy it.
#3 Ticket to Ride
Ticket to Ride combines the elements of Strategy, Turn-based, and Classic Board. The game is available to play on cross-platforms developed Days of Wonder. It takes place on the world map and puts you on an epic adventure where you must score points as you can for claiming routes on the map. Connect cities with the help of train routes and build the longest routes. To win the game you must score the highest points. In the beginning, the game offers forty-five trains with different colors to each player and lets him place on the routes with the help of cards and apply your favorite color. In the game, you can use some cards with proper color equal to a lot of spaces on the routes to claim and score points. Ticket to Ride offers core features such as Vertical Maps, Different Trains, Turn by Turn Tutorial, Cross-platform, Detailed visuals, and more. Ticket to Ride is one of the best game as compared to other board games.
#4 Unity of Command: Stalingrad Campaign
Unity of Command: Stalingrad Campaign is a Turn-based Strategy, WWII, Single and Multiplayer video game developed and published by 2×2 Games. The game revolves around between two factions such as German and Russia. In the beginning, you play as German and your ultimate task is to assume the role of the commander, lead your army through a variety of levels and attack enemy in turn-based combat. The game takes place in the World War 2 during 1942 to 1943. Lead your army and attempts to destroy against army using a variety of weapons and strategies. Defend your units, and try to eliminate the soldiers of against team to win the match. The game rewards you with points as you win and you can use these points to upgrade your army, units and weapons. Progress through the game and expand your units further and further and conquer the entire land to become the master. Unity of Command: Stalingrad Campaign is the wonderful game as compared to other Turn-based Strategy games.
#5 Risk II
Risk II is a Turn-based Strategy, Single and Multiplayer video game developed by Deep Red Games and published by Hasbro Interactive. It is an online version of the classic board game named Risk. It introduces two new modes such as a Single-player Tournament and Same Time. In Single-player Tournament, the player can compete against AI in multiple turn-based matches while in Same Time mode, and the player can compete against opponents and turns are taken by all players simultaneously. Up to 8-player can complete against each other in local multiplayer mode. The game takes place in the 18th and 19th century and introduces a variety of opponents such as Solignac, Aubert, Freire, Marmont, Campbell, and more. Each opponent has its different attack and play style. The player can assume the role of the general, and his primary task is to make strategy, dice roll and attack opponent on his turn. The player can participate in tournament mode, a combination of both Same Time and Classic. The game has sixteen different levels, and the competition will end if the player will die during any level. Try it out, and you'll enjoy it.
#6 XCOM: TBG
XCOM: TBG is an addictive and Board video game released by Fantasy Flight Games for mobile platforms, Windows, and Mac. The game puts you, and other three other players in the role of the commander of the Elite International Organization called XCOM. According to the plot, alien forces, and other enemy factions are planning to destroy the humanity. Now it's your job to defend your territory and rescue the humanity by defeating alien races and enemies. In the game, as the UFOs occur in orbit and panic invades to national governments. The game lets you test your luck through rolling dice mechanics and engage you in uncertainty and tension of the desperate conflict against a mysterious foe. You as the hero are the last hope of the humanity. XCOM: TBG is the incredible game as compared to other board games.
#7 Talisman: Digital Edition: The Blood Moon
Talisman: Digital Edition: The Blood Moon is a Downloadable Content Pack for the original title Talisman: Digital Edition developed and published by Nomad Games for Microsoft Windows. The game comes with 111 new Adventure Cards, 1 time Card, 10 New Spell Cards, Three alternate endings, and more. The gameplay centers on role-playing and strategy elements and offers a thrilling story, in which the world is threatened by sinister and vampires who are looking for their hunt. The player takes on the role of the protagonist, who is a hero and must explore the world to battle against foes while battling against enemies in turn-based combat to beat the enemies and restore the peace. According to the plot, the brutal werewolf is looking for heroes with whom they want to share the curse. As the player proceeds, the gameplay becomes tough to master. Talisman: Digital Edition – The Blood Moon includes prominent features such as 111 New Adventure Cards, 11 Spell Cards, 3 Alternative Endings, a Feral Creature, and more. Try it out, and you'll love it.
#8 Warhammer Quest
Warhammer Quest offers the super gameplay deals with Turn-based, Strategy, Role-playing and Board gameplay elements developed by Rodeo Games and published by Chilled Mouse for Multiple Platforms. The game takes place in the grid-based map on the board and plays from a top-down viewpoint. It presents an addictive blend of strategy and RPG elements and enables the player to command a team of brave adventurers through dungeons of the Warhammer World for wealth and glory. During the gameplay, the player can level up his party of heroes, loot armour, weapons and rare artifacts from killed enemies. There are several playable heroes available, and the player can select one of them to advance through the game and gather useful items. As the player progresses through the game, further content will be unlocked to play. Warhammer Quest includes prominent features such as Top-down Navigation, Loot Weapons, RPG mix Strategy Gameplay, and more.
#9 Galactic Keep
Galactic Keep is a Board, Strategy, Role-playing, and Single-player video game developed and published by Gilded Skull Games for Multiple Platforms. The game is set in the science-fiction board and offer tabletop-style gameplay with RPG aspects. In the game, the player has to investigate the maps in the richly described land, and he is free to move anywhere across the map, navigating for hours. In the start, the player has to select the path of his adventure in the open-world environment full of hidden surprises across every corner, loot-filled, and challenging turn. There are many things more than your expected to do. The game deals with three main elements such as Create, Gather, and Fight. The game starts with the player choosing his character from available with unique abilities and then jump into the challenging world to complete the objectives. During the gameplay, players will find out dozens of weaponry, special attacks, and items as he fights against enemies to complete the mission. While playing, he is capable of unlocking an array of hidden playable characters as he navigates, makes choices, and more.
Let me say this now: Leopard is good for an upgrade, but there is no wow, nothing that would excite me to switch to a Mac when compared to Tiger. It's merely an OS update that was meant to fill the evolutionary void and is reminiscent of Vista: delays, 'overhauled' interface as a touted feature, and not many compelling features that would really make you want to upgrade.
And yes, I am comparing Mac OS X Leopard to Windows Vista, but please put your pitchforks and burning weapons down for a moment. I've been playing with Leopard since Saturday and there are some things I do like about this update, but before I start echoing other bloggers, I have to lay down the similarities here between Cupertino's OS and Redmond's main competitor.
Just Another Pretty Face
Delays
Leopard, like Vista, has been pushed back so a usable product can be released to the masses, but outside developments show how much of a toll other priorities can take.
Vista was delayed not due to a massive code rewrite as previously speculated but due to code compatibility issues, primarily with 3rd parties. A valid reason, but we can see the effects of the delay today in an evolutionary upgrade void of features that would make someone's mouth drop. I am not dissing Vista in any way (as much as some of you may want me to) but it filled in a peg in the ladder which was enough for Microsoft and their user base.
The same can be applied to Leopard. Apple needed more resources to develop their iPhone platform, which was an OS X install stripped down for a radically different computing environment. Making OS X play nice with the iPhone was no easy task, but a monumental one; plus the ongoing development put strains on Apple's development team, causing them to push their shipping date back twice.
As with Vista, what caused the delays has left its mark on the next generation OS, and while it may pique the interests of developers, it's not as tempting as Tiger was to Panther users or Jaguar to Classic users. Leopard was meant to fill in a gaping void, but Apple delivered with minimal results (from an average user's perspective), making the decision to upgrade a debatable choice.
No 'Wow'
While Steve Jobs gallantly gave his keynote during WWDC ‘06, he taunted Microsoft's efforts in developing Vista with his own herculean team and crack shots at the Redmond based company. Although only 10 features were shown off in fear that Vista would somehow mimic Leopard blow for blow, it'd be the best thing we'd get from a 'wow' standpoint.
Time Machine, full 64 Bit compatability, Core Animation, and Mail Stationery are all worthy additions to the Mac platform, but how it was presented during WWDC left us wanting more. We interpreted these 10 somewhat notable additions as an appetizer in preparation for the full course, one that would totally blow anything Apple had shipped before out of the water.
Sadly this would not come to be. These 10 additions would be bunched in with Steve's 'Top Secret Features' and regurgitated next year before Leopard's second publicly announced delay.
Notice the similarity now between the two OSes? Other priorities can really scatter any progress made on a project, something Apple and Microsoft have had to learn the hard way.
The 'wow' factor lacks in Leopard. Sure Time Machine rocks—its automated backups and those new stationery templates in Mail will truly revolutionize how I write email—but Steve left us wanting for more and more then left some of us hanging, mouths gaping in either despair or astonishment.
More Evolutionary Than Revolutionary
Leopard unintentionally filled a void created by the previous OS release before it to continue the evolutionary chain without disruption. And that's just what Leopard is, an evolution of OS X rather than a revolution.
Apple has continually stepped up their game by making OS X more and more appealing to the average user and hard core Mac geek alike, but they've delved from that normal path to focus more on developers. This isn't bad in any sense, and Leopard is by no means something thrown together in order to meet the bare minimum requirements.
Princessize mac os. It was something that needed to happen, to fill in the needs and wants of certain users, and Apple did that by throwing developers a bone and making Leopard more friendly for 3rd parties.
Major Changes
However, Leopard has undergone significant changes which will eventually outpace the PowerPC platform and reduce it to nothing more than a ball and chain to an archaic means of using a Mac. Leopard will pave the road for truly great things when Apple utilizes Intel processors to their full extent.
Interface
Leopard resembles iTunes in appearance, which is a great direction to go in for many reasons. But in my opinion, Apple may have taken it a bit too far by making it a complete clone of the popular media management application.
First off, iTunes is easy to use, it's simple and does what it does well while being able to handle your digital life without much fuss. Incorporating iTunes' interface within the Finder is a logical decision to aid switchers in grasping the Mac platform while retaining some familiarity with Windows.
Having an easy to use and universal interface accessible anywhere is a selling point considering it's based off an application that millions of people use and love. This allows Apple to tout iTunes as Mac OS X for Windows with the Mac, a sandbox for users to prepare or persuade them to switch.
Although radically different, the unification of every window to resemble iTunes does get annoying after some time, coupled with the default space-like theme thrust upon you from the start. Brushed metal is no more, with darker grays that will stand out even though they're clones of one another with little differentiation.
That is Finder. The other big overhaul is the Dock. Apple has touted the Dock as the central location for everything you need to access quickly and a much more efficient alternative to the task bar. Continuing this trend, the Dock is more prominent than before by consuming more space and delving from its original intentions of simplicity.
This new glassy Dock is visually appealing and adds a bit of flare and realism to your Mac. Stacks, on the other hand, being exclusive to the Dock, reasserts its authority as your Mac's control center. Files and folders can be accessed from the Dock without much hassle, but this functionality existed long ago, Leopard only made it visually appealing. By dragging a folder down to the Dock, you could click and hold to access its contents in list form, and anything could be launched from here as well. Stacks is nothing more than a glorified version of this concept, but crippled in that less items are shown.
RSS: Really Simple Suffering
Tiger brought forth Safari 2 and RSS support. Leopard has stepped it up a notch and brought in its A-game for information aggregation. Your data can be manipulated faster than before but is thrown in your face so many times, although useful, I've dubbed it RSS, Really Simple Suffering.
The suffering in this case is good, it's information you want to see and have at your finger tips but it's aggregated so simply it requires not attention until some app starts popping in your face to remind you about 3:30 PM Dentist Appointment and that you need to plot the directions on your iPhone.
But Apple has taken a different approach to centralizing functions into Applications by fusing Web based elements with traditional methods of manipulating data. I'm talking about Safari, iCal, .Mac and Mail. All 3 involve publishing and aggregating content to and fro across multiple Macs. RSS feeds are now accessible within not only Safari but also Mail, the purpose of this I do not know but it possibly has to do with information overload when it comes to one Application handling everything.
But it doesn't stop there: Apple has taken this up a notch by syncing all this data to make it even more redundant (nothing wrong with that!). Most of this is being done through .Mac which was recently revamped to accommodate the new changes in Leopard.
Dock Items, Widgets, System Preferences, Notes ,and Calendars are synced across every registered Mac, but it gets better. While syncing all this data may be great, Back to my Mac and iChat screen sharing make it even better by providing seamless access to your data no matter where you are.
Talisman: Digital Edition: The Blood Moon is a Downloadable Content Pack for the original title Talisman: Digital Edition developed and published by Nomad Games for Microsoft Windows. The game comes with 111 new Adventure Cards, 1 time Card, 10 New Spell Cards, Three alternate endings, and more. The gameplay centers on role-playing and strategy elements and offers a thrilling story, in which the world is threatened by sinister and vampires who are looking for their hunt. The player takes on the role of the protagonist, who is a hero and must explore the world to battle against foes while battling against enemies in turn-based combat to beat the enemies and restore the peace. According to the plot, the brutal werewolf is looking for heroes with whom they want to share the curse. As the player proceeds, the gameplay becomes tough to master. Talisman: Digital Edition – The Blood Moon includes prominent features such as 111 New Adventure Cards, 11 Spell Cards, 3 Alternative Endings, a Feral Creature, and more. Try it out, and you'll love it.
#8 Warhammer Quest
Warhammer Quest offers the super gameplay deals with Turn-based, Strategy, Role-playing and Board gameplay elements developed by Rodeo Games and published by Chilled Mouse for Multiple Platforms. The game takes place in the grid-based map on the board and plays from a top-down viewpoint. It presents an addictive blend of strategy and RPG elements and enables the player to command a team of brave adventurers through dungeons of the Warhammer World for wealth and glory. During the gameplay, the player can level up his party of heroes, loot armour, weapons and rare artifacts from killed enemies. There are several playable heroes available, and the player can select one of them to advance through the game and gather useful items. As the player progresses through the game, further content will be unlocked to play. Warhammer Quest includes prominent features such as Top-down Navigation, Loot Weapons, RPG mix Strategy Gameplay, and more.
#9 Galactic Keep
Galactic Keep is a Board, Strategy, Role-playing, and Single-player video game developed and published by Gilded Skull Games for Multiple Platforms. The game is set in the science-fiction board and offer tabletop-style gameplay with RPG aspects. In the game, the player has to investigate the maps in the richly described land, and he is free to move anywhere across the map, navigating for hours. In the start, the player has to select the path of his adventure in the open-world environment full of hidden surprises across every corner, loot-filled, and challenging turn. There are many things more than your expected to do. The game deals with three main elements such as Create, Gather, and Fight. The game starts with the player choosing his character from available with unique abilities and then jump into the challenging world to complete the objectives. During the gameplay, players will find out dozens of weaponry, special attacks, and items as he fights against enemies to complete the mission. While playing, he is capable of unlocking an array of hidden playable characters as he navigates, makes choices, and more.
Let me say this now: Leopard is good for an upgrade, but there is no wow, nothing that would excite me to switch to a Mac when compared to Tiger. It's merely an OS update that was meant to fill the evolutionary void and is reminiscent of Vista: delays, 'overhauled' interface as a touted feature, and not many compelling features that would really make you want to upgrade.
And yes, I am comparing Mac OS X Leopard to Windows Vista, but please put your pitchforks and burning weapons down for a moment. I've been playing with Leopard since Saturday and there are some things I do like about this update, but before I start echoing other bloggers, I have to lay down the similarities here between Cupertino's OS and Redmond's main competitor.
Just Another Pretty Face
Delays
Leopard, like Vista, has been pushed back so a usable product can be released to the masses, but outside developments show how much of a toll other priorities can take.
Vista was delayed not due to a massive code rewrite as previously speculated but due to code compatibility issues, primarily with 3rd parties. A valid reason, but we can see the effects of the delay today in an evolutionary upgrade void of features that would make someone's mouth drop. I am not dissing Vista in any way (as much as some of you may want me to) but it filled in a peg in the ladder which was enough for Microsoft and their user base.
The same can be applied to Leopard. Apple needed more resources to develop their iPhone platform, which was an OS X install stripped down for a radically different computing environment. Making OS X play nice with the iPhone was no easy task, but a monumental one; plus the ongoing development put strains on Apple's development team, causing them to push their shipping date back twice.
As with Vista, what caused the delays has left its mark on the next generation OS, and while it may pique the interests of developers, it's not as tempting as Tiger was to Panther users or Jaguar to Classic users. Leopard was meant to fill in a gaping void, but Apple delivered with minimal results (from an average user's perspective), making the decision to upgrade a debatable choice.
No 'Wow'
While Steve Jobs gallantly gave his keynote during WWDC ‘06, he taunted Microsoft's efforts in developing Vista with his own herculean team and crack shots at the Redmond based company. Although only 10 features were shown off in fear that Vista would somehow mimic Leopard blow for blow, it'd be the best thing we'd get from a 'wow' standpoint.
Time Machine, full 64 Bit compatability, Core Animation, and Mail Stationery are all worthy additions to the Mac platform, but how it was presented during WWDC left us wanting more. We interpreted these 10 somewhat notable additions as an appetizer in preparation for the full course, one that would totally blow anything Apple had shipped before out of the water.
Sadly this would not come to be. These 10 additions would be bunched in with Steve's 'Top Secret Features' and regurgitated next year before Leopard's second publicly announced delay.
Notice the similarity now between the two OSes? Other priorities can really scatter any progress made on a project, something Apple and Microsoft have had to learn the hard way.
The 'wow' factor lacks in Leopard. Sure Time Machine rocks—its automated backups and those new stationery templates in Mail will truly revolutionize how I write email—but Steve left us wanting for more and more then left some of us hanging, mouths gaping in either despair or astonishment.
More Evolutionary Than Revolutionary
Leopard unintentionally filled a void created by the previous OS release before it to continue the evolutionary chain without disruption. And that's just what Leopard is, an evolution of OS X rather than a revolution.
Apple has continually stepped up their game by making OS X more and more appealing to the average user and hard core Mac geek alike, but they've delved from that normal path to focus more on developers. This isn't bad in any sense, and Leopard is by no means something thrown together in order to meet the bare minimum requirements.
Princessize mac os. It was something that needed to happen, to fill in the needs and wants of certain users, and Apple did that by throwing developers a bone and making Leopard more friendly for 3rd parties.
Major Changes
However, Leopard has undergone significant changes which will eventually outpace the PowerPC platform and reduce it to nothing more than a ball and chain to an archaic means of using a Mac. Leopard will pave the road for truly great things when Apple utilizes Intel processors to their full extent.
Interface
Leopard resembles iTunes in appearance, which is a great direction to go in for many reasons. But in my opinion, Apple may have taken it a bit too far by making it a complete clone of the popular media management application.
First off, iTunes is easy to use, it's simple and does what it does well while being able to handle your digital life without much fuss. Incorporating iTunes' interface within the Finder is a logical decision to aid switchers in grasping the Mac platform while retaining some familiarity with Windows.
Having an easy to use and universal interface accessible anywhere is a selling point considering it's based off an application that millions of people use and love. This allows Apple to tout iTunes as Mac OS X for Windows with the Mac, a sandbox for users to prepare or persuade them to switch.
Although radically different, the unification of every window to resemble iTunes does get annoying after some time, coupled with the default space-like theme thrust upon you from the start. Brushed metal is no more, with darker grays that will stand out even though they're clones of one another with little differentiation.
That is Finder. The other big overhaul is the Dock. Apple has touted the Dock as the central location for everything you need to access quickly and a much more efficient alternative to the task bar. Continuing this trend, the Dock is more prominent than before by consuming more space and delving from its original intentions of simplicity.
This new glassy Dock is visually appealing and adds a bit of flare and realism to your Mac. Stacks, on the other hand, being exclusive to the Dock, reasserts its authority as your Mac's control center. Files and folders can be accessed from the Dock without much hassle, but this functionality existed long ago, Leopard only made it visually appealing. By dragging a folder down to the Dock, you could click and hold to access its contents in list form, and anything could be launched from here as well. Stacks is nothing more than a glorified version of this concept, but crippled in that less items are shown.
RSS: Really Simple Suffering
Tiger brought forth Safari 2 and RSS support. Leopard has stepped it up a notch and brought in its A-game for information aggregation. Your data can be manipulated faster than before but is thrown in your face so many times, although useful, I've dubbed it RSS, Really Simple Suffering.
The suffering in this case is good, it's information you want to see and have at your finger tips but it's aggregated so simply it requires not attention until some app starts popping in your face to remind you about 3:30 PM Dentist Appointment and that you need to plot the directions on your iPhone.
But Apple has taken a different approach to centralizing functions into Applications by fusing Web based elements with traditional methods of manipulating data. I'm talking about Safari, iCal, .Mac and Mail. All 3 involve publishing and aggregating content to and fro across multiple Macs. RSS feeds are now accessible within not only Safari but also Mail, the purpose of this I do not know but it possibly has to do with information overload when it comes to one Application handling everything.
But it doesn't stop there: Apple has taken this up a notch by syncing all this data to make it even more redundant (nothing wrong with that!). Most of this is being done through .Mac which was recently revamped to accommodate the new changes in Leopard.
Dock Items, Widgets, System Preferences, Notes ,and Calendars are synced across every registered Mac, but it gets better. While syncing all this data may be great, Back to my Mac and iChat screen sharing make it even better by providing seamless access to your data no matter where you are.
Multitasking
Multitasking under OS X is made easier with Spaces. Although it seems simple in its current incarnation, the app's usefulness is unprecedented.
By providing up to 16 virtual spaces for your Apps to reside and launch in, you can organize your workflow to increase productivity. My current setup is having one scratch Space for miscellaneous applications. My 2nd is for Mail, iCal, iChat, and Stickies, the 3rd for Safari, the 4th for any text editors such as iWork and Text Edit, plus the 5th being utilized for media utilities such as Quicktime, Visual Hub, iTunes, and Front Row.
Not a bad combo, but your mileage will vary. What makes Spaces exceed where others have failed is that it's very, very responsive with little notice that you have actually switched to a different space. The fluidity in which Spaces functions make this a worthy App.
Knowing that each section is not an extra screen but a self contained environment for individual applications, but also having access to everything no matter where you are fools you into thinking you're not even running Spaces, it's that good!
Hesitant Upgraders
I have experienced no flaws with Leopard besides the usual 'It'll run better if you have a fast Mac,' but the biggest flaw is that it isn't good enough for some users.
Leopard opens a new avenue for developers to create truly awesome applications, but besides under the hood improvements, it's less than tempting to upgrade if Time Machine and the newly revamped Finder aren't enough to convince you.
But here's the thing: you'll be forced to upgrade to Leopard if nothing else. Developers are creating Leopard-only applications and although few in number, it'll spread quickly. It becomes harder and harder to support older Operating Systems when newer features are unavailable. It comes down to 'Do I support the greater number of users who have Leopard and make a better application or support almost everyone but take out features?'
This choice has already been made, and Leopard will be the minimum option for applications.
But that leaves a group of users who are reluctant to upgrade and soon to be without support for newer applications. It's a delicate balance, as you have to please the average user to upgrade while appealing to developers. It's something hard to do, but Leopard won't be the Operating System that causes a shift; Macs will come with Leopard by default and it'll be an inevitable choice. The ones holding out are those who have hardware that functions but won't run Leopard.
Pretty Panzer Mac Os Download
Conclusion
Leopard is a great Operating System and will excite developers more than the normal user. Witch tower mac os. But these new features, although good, aren't great due to delays and being spoiled early on. I am not dissing Leopard, but this is something that had to happen, and while it was touted as a Vista competitor, it's more of a pretty knockoff in that Leopard won't convince you to switch if Tiger didn't and the 'Wow' factor is lacking.
